Home / Condition-Specific Guidance

Knee Ligament and Meniscal Injuries

  • Last Updated:

About Knee Ligament and Meniscal Tears

Knee meniscus injuries involve traumatic or degenerative disruption of the medial or lateral meniscus, structures essential for load distribution, shock absorption, and joint stability. These injuries commonly present with joint-line pain, swelling, and mechanical symptoms such as catching or locking, with symptoms often exacerbated by squatting, pivoting, deep knee flexion. Traumatic meniscal tears are frequently associated with twisting mechanisms or sports-related injuries, whereas degenerative tears are more common with aging and often coexist with osteoarthritic changes. Clinical presentation and prognosis are influenced by tear characteristics, the presence of concomitant ligament or chondral injury, and neuromuscular and biomechanical factors.

Knee ligament injuries involve partial or complete disruption of stabilizing ligaments, most commonly the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), or lateral collateral ligament (LCL). These injuries typically present with acute pain, swelling, joint instability, and difficulty with activities requiring cutting, pivoting, or rapid deceleration. Mechanisms may include non-contact torsional loading or direct trauma. Outcomes are influenced by injury severity, associated meniscal or chondral damage, neuromuscular control, and adherence to rehabilitation.

Across both injury types, impairments in strength, coordination, proprioception, and movement control are common and contribute to functional limitations and reinjury risk. Accurate clinical assessment using a cluster-based approach, combined with impairment-informed rehabilitation planning, supports appropriate nonoperative management or post-operative recovery and safe return to activity.

About CCG Care Pathways

Purpose

CCG is a knowledge translation resource of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. Its care pathways help chiropractors and other clinicians organize conservative care for musculoskeletal conditions. Each pathway outlines the main steps of the clinical encounter and supports decisions about assessment, care, monitoring, referral, co-management, and discharge. The pathways provide a structured approach to care, not a fixed prescription.

Development

Pathways draw on relevant clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, peer-reviewed literature, and safety or professional sources. These sources inform, but do not determine, pathway content. Their findings reflect the questions, populations, outcomes, methods, and judgments used and may not apply to every person. Condition-specific sources are identified by author or organization and year, with full citations in one reference list at the end of the pathway.

Principles of Care

Musculoskeletal conditions are shaped by physical, psychological, social, cultural, and environmental factors, so no single approach fits everyone. Good care is ethical, evidence-informed, person-centred, culturally responsive, and tailored to the patient’s goals, preferences, circumstances, and response. Shared decision-making and informed consent guide care. Education, active rehabilitation, and self-management support recovery, functioning, participation, and long-term health. Regular reassessment shows whether the plan is helping and when to continue, adapt, stop, refer, co-manage, or discharge.populations.

Pathway Flow at a Glance

The pathway follows a recurring clinical cycle: understand the person and their goals; screen for safety and referral needs; develop a working clinical profile; agree on a plan and relevant outcomes; provide care; reassess response and safety; and continue, adapt, stop, refer, co-manage, or discharge as appropriate.

Disclaimer

CCG care pathways support professional clinical judgment; they do not replace it or the advice of a qualified provider. They are not prescriptive, authoritative, or regulatory and are not intended for diagnosis or billing. Clinicians remain responsible for practicing within their competence and scope, meeting applicable legal and regulatory requirements, obtaining informed consent, recognizing emergencies, and arranging referral or co-management when needed.

Knee Ligament and Meniscal Injuries Care Pathway

1. Record Keeping

Accurate, timely, and sufficiently detailed documentation supports safe, high-quality care. The record should reflect clinically relevant patient interactions, clinical reasoning, decisions, care provided, and progress over time. Documentation should meet the legal, regulatory, privacy, retention, and organizational requirements that apply where the clinician practices. A structured format, such as SOAP, may support consistency, clarity, and continuity and can be adapted to the encounter and practice setting.

Subjective: Record the patient’s concerns, symptoms, functioning and participation, goals, preferences, relevant history and context, and response or adverse effects from previous care.

Objective: Record relevant examination findings, outcome measures, diagnostic test results when available, and clinically important changes.

Assessment: Record the clinical interpretation of findings, working diagnosis or clinical profile, differential and safety considerations, relevant risk factors or modifiers, and the patient’s progress or response.

Plan: Record care provided or proposed, education and self-management, consent and patient decisions, changes to the plan, agreed outcomes and reassessment point, referrals or co-management, follow-up, and discharge planning.

Document at the time of the encounter or as soon as practicable. Corrections and additions should preserve the integrity of the record. Clear records support patient safety, shared decision-making, communication, continuity, and accountability.

2. Informed Consent
  • Definition: A continuing process in which a capable patient, or an authorized substitute decision-maker when required, voluntarily agrees to a proposed examination or intervention after receiving and understanding the information needed to make an informed choice.
  • Key Aspects:
    • Prior to interaction: Obtain consent before beginning an examination, procedure, or treatment, except where applicable law permits otherwise. Explain what is proposed and why. Revisit consent when the plan or material information changes.
    • Voluntarily and specific: must be voluntary and specific to the proposed care. Consider the patient’s capacity for the decision at the time it is required and follow applicable requirements for substitute decision-making when the patient lacks capacity. The patient may ask questions, refuse, place limits on, or withdraw consent.
    • Transparent process: Use honest, plain, and accessible communication. Offer interpretation or other communication support when needed and consider language, culture, health literacy, disability, and prior trauma. Written or digital information may support but does not replace discussion.
    • Patient understanding and agreement:
      • Diagnosis/prognosis: Explain relevant findings, the clinical impression or working diagnosis, important uncertainty, and the expected course in understandable language.
      • Treatment plan: Discuss the nature and purpose of proposed care, expected benefits, material risks and side effects, burdens, reasonable alternatives, the option of no intervention, and the likely consequences of accepting or declining.
      • Questions: Invite questions, explore goals and preferences, allow appropriate time for a decision, and confirm understanding, for example using teach-back.
    • Documentation: Record the consent discussion and decision, including material information provided, questions, capacity or substitute decision-maker where relevant, consent, refusal, limits or withdrawal, and any need to revisit consent. Follow documentation requirements applicable to the jurisdiction and practice setting.
3. Health History
  • Apply cultural awareness and trauma-informed care principles.
  • Sociodemographic information: Age, gender, sex, race/ethnicity.
  • Main complaint: Description of knee symptoms, including pain, swelling, stiffness, instability, giving way, catching, or locking. Document onset (sudden vs gradual), symptom behaviour, aggravating and easing factors, and current functional limitations.
  • Mechanism and injury context
  • Traumatic vs non-traumatic onset
  • Contact vs non-contact mechanism
  • Twisting, pivoting, deceleration, valgus or hyperextension forces
  • Audible or perceived “pop” at time of injury
  • Immediate vs delayed swelling or effusion
  • Ability to continue activity or weight-bear following injury
  • Body systems: Neurologic, cardiovascular, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, bone density, eyes/ears/nose/throat, respiratory, skin, mental health, reproductive.
  • Health, lifestyle, and history: Past medical conditions, medications (including anticoagulants and corticosteroids), supplements, prior knee or lower-limb injuries, surgeries, hospitalizations, and relevant comorbidities. Document physical activity level, sport participation, training load, footwear, work or school demands, sleep, and general health behaviours.
  • Social determinants of health: Employment, childcare, education, nutrition, housing, domestic violence, child maltreatment, discrimination, social isolation.
  • Previous treatments and responses: Prior investigations, treatments (e.g., rest, bracing, exercise, injections, surgery), perceived benefit, adverse effects, and adherence.
  • Beliefs, expectations, and understanding: Patient understanding of the injury, expectations regarding recovery or return to activity, concerns about instability, reinjury, or long-term joint health.
  • Flag considerations: Screen for red flags, orange flags, and yellow flags that may influence care planning or require referral

​​Outcomes Assessments:

  • Pain: Use pain scales (e.g., NRS) and diagrams.
  • Function and Participation: Evaluate impact on daily activities (PSFS, WHODAS, WOMAC, KOOS, LEFS).
  • Recovery: Use self-rated recovery scales.
  • Quality of life: Assess using tools such as SF-12.
  • Work/school status: Monitor return to activities.
  • Physical performance (baseline reporting): Walking, stair negotiation, squatting, running, cutting, or pivoting
  • Individual goals: Set SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timely).
  • Patient feedback: Gatherand integrate patient experience and satisfaction.
4. Red Flags : Differential Diagnosis Requiring Medical Referral

ACTION: Refer immediately to emergency care:

  • Suspected fracture or dislocation
    • History of significant trauma or diminished bone integrity
    • Inability to bear weight, gross deformity, rapidly developing effusion/hemarthrosis, or severe pain
  • Suspected joint or bone infection
    • Acute monoarticular pain with swelling, warmth, erythema
    • Fever or systemic symptoms
    • Severe pain with passive knee motion or inability to tolerate movement
  • Suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or vascular compromise
    • Posterior knee, calf, or thigh pain with unilateral swelling, warmth, redness, or edema
    • Sudden shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness, or syncope (possible pulmonary embolism)
  • Acute neurovascular compromise
    • Progressive numbness, weakness, pallor, loss of distal pulses, or pain out of proportion to findings

ACTION: Refer to appropriate medical provider:

  • Inflammatory or systemic arthropathy
    • Suspicion of inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, reactive arthritis) based on multi-joint involvement, prolonged morning stiffness, or systemic features
  • Avascular necrosis or bone pathology
    • Progressive pain and functional decline not consistent with mechanical injury, particularly in individuals with corticosteroid use, alcohol misuse, or systemic disease
  • Unexplained or progressive symptoms
    • Worsening pain, swelling, instability, or functional loss disproportionate to findings or not responding to appropriate conservative care
5. Orange Flags: Symptoms of Psychiatric Disorders Requiring Referral

Orange Flags are signs that a mental health or substance use concern may require emergency or timely assessment or shared care, and may change whether and how MSK care proceeds. They are not diagnoses. Ask directly and respectfully when concern arises, considering immediate safety, severity, change from usual, daily functioning and context. Psychosocial factors that may affect recovery but do not require separate mental health or medical assessment are addressed under Yellow Flags.

ACTION: Arrange emergency assessment now when there is immediate danger or an urgent medical need:

  • Suicide, self-harm or harm to others: current intent or plan, a recent attempt, inability to stay safe, or behaviour suggesting an immediate risk of serious harm.
  • Severe change in mental state: extreme agitation, confusion, disorganization, possible psychosis or mania with impaired judgment or unsafe behaviour, or inability to meet basic needs when this creates immediate danger.
  • Substance-related or medical emergency: suspected overdose, severe intoxication, dangerous withdrawal, delirium or another sudden change requiring urgent medical care.

When immediate safety is uncertain, do not leave the person alone while help is arranged. Follow local emergency procedures and call 9-1-1 for immediate danger or urgent medical need. If the person is thinking about suicide, call or text 9-8-8: Suicide Crisis Helpline with them or support them to do so.

If violence, abuse or exploitation is disclosed or suspected, support immediate safety and follow applicable safety and reporting requirements.

ACTION: Arrange prompt medical or mental health assessment when there is:

  • Suicide or self-harm thoughts: thoughts without immediate danger.
  • Substantial symptoms or effects: severe, persistent or worsening symptoms of depression, anxiety, trauma, possible psychosis or mania, eating problems or substance use that substantially affect daily life, decision-making or safe participation in care.
  • Other reasons for assessment: a marked change from usual behaviour or functioning; concern about medication or substance effects; a presentation outside the clinician’s competence; or a request for help.

Agree with the patient on who will be contacted, how soon and what to do if the situation worsens. Confirm that the person has connected with the service when clinically important.

ACTION: Adapt and coordinate MSK care:

  • Safe care: care may continue when it is safe and acceptable and does not delay needed assessment. Adapt communication, examination and care; obtain ongoing consent; and coordinate with other providers with the patient’s permission.
  • Continue the MSK assessment: do not assume that a mental health or substance use concern explains the MSK presentation. Continue to consider physical causes and the patient’s account.
  • Questionnaires: they may support conversation and monitoring, but do not establish a diagnosis or replace direct questions, clinical judgment or action.
  • Acceptable support: ask what type of help is acceptable and whether language, cultural, family, community or other supports are important to the patient.

ACTION: Document and follow up:

Record the concern; relevant questions and the patient’s responses; the safety decision and reasons; actions, advice and referrals; communication and consent; follow-up; and any unresolved concern. Follow applicable privacy, safety and reporting requirements.

For provincial, territorial and national services, see Mental health support: Get help (Public Health Agency of Canada 2026).

6. Yellow Flags: Factors that May Affect Recovery or Participation

Yellow Flags are personal, social, work, school, healthcare, environmental or structural factors that may influence symptoms, functioning, participation or response to care. They are contextual, not diagnoses or certain predictions, and do not mean that symptoms are psychological. They guide how care is tailored and do not by themselves require urgent referral. Explore them through conversation and ongoing outcome review, with attention to the patient’s priorities, strengths and circumstances. A separate Yellow Flag score is not required. New or worsening signs of serious physical illness follow the Red Flag process. Mental health or substance use concerns that need separate assessment, or any immediate safety concern, follow the Orange Flag process and applicable emergency or safeguarding procedures.

Explore relevant factors:

  • Understanding, expectations and healthcare experiences: concerns about injury or damage, uncertainty, recovery expectations, confidence, conflicting advice, previous dismissal or harm, and trust in care.
  • Responses to symptoms and activity: worry, fear, avoidance, cycles of doing too much and then needing prolonged rest, difficulty pacing, coping, sleep, confidence in self-management, and return to meaningful activities.
  • Emotional and life context: distress, low mood, anxiety, grief, trauma, caregiving, relationship change, job loss or other major events. Ask permission before sensitive questions and limit discussion to what is relevant and acceptable to the patient.
  • Relationships, culture and strengths: supportive relationships, isolation, family and community roles, cultural or spiritual practices, identity, preferences, language and other sources of resilience.
  • Work, school and administrative context: physical and psychosocial demands, control, satisfaction, job security, accommodations, return concerns, and compensation, insurance or legal processes. Explore these neutrally and in context.
  • Social and structural conditions: consider social and structural determinants of health (Public Health Agency of Canada 2026), including income, housing, food security, transportation, childcare, access and cost of care, discrimination, racism, colonialism, neighbourhood and workplace conditions, and physical or digital accessibility.

ACTION: Respond with the patient:

  • Ask, do not assume: use open questions to understand what helps, what gets in the way, what matters and what feels feasible. Ask about strengths and protective factors, not only difficulties. Do not treat a person’s circumstances, culture or choices as a deficit.
  • Plan together: integrate relevant findings into shared goals, education, self-management, physical activity or exercise, and participation in meaningful activities. Adapt communication, setting, pace, cost and access where possible.
  • Connect and coordinate: with the patient’s consent, consider appropriate clinical, social, workplace, school, community, Indigenous or culturally specific supports. Clarify who will do what and follow up when the connection is important to the plan.
  • Review response to care: reassess the patient’s account and the pathway’s selected outcomes at clinically relevant points. If progress differs from expected, review the clinical impression, care plan, access and other barriers; do not automatically attribute the outcome to Yellow Flags.
  • Document: record relevant factors and strengths, the patient’s priorities and preferences, agreed actions, consent, referrals or coordination, follow-up, and any change requiring the Orange Flag process.
7. Physical Examination

The physical examination should be hypothesis-driven and informed by the health history, mechanism of injury, and identified red flags.

 Observation

  • Inspect for swelling, effusion, bruising, asymmetry, or deformity.
  • Observe posture, gait pattern, balance, and movement strategies during functional tasks (e.g., walking, turning, sit-to-stand).
  • Note use of assistive devices or protective behaviours.

Range of motion (ROM)

  • Assess active and passive knee ROM in flexion and extension.
  • Assess tibial internal and external rotation as clinically indicated.
  • Note pain response, motion limitations, end-feel, and asymmetry.

Palpation

  • Palpate for joint-line tenderness, effusion, warmth, or localized soft-tissue tenderness.
  • Assess periarticular structures as indicated by history and symptoms.

Strength and neuromuscular control

  • Screen lower-limb strength, emphasizing quadriceps and hamstring function.
  • Observe coordination, control, and symmetry during functional movements where safe.

Neurological screening

  • Perform focused neurological screening if symptoms suggest neural involvement, including motor strength, sensation, and reflexes as indicated.

Special/orthopaedic tests

  • Use ligament- and meniscus-specific tests selectively to support clinical reasoning, recognizing that no single test is diagnostic. Examples include:
    • Ligament integrity tests: Lachman, pivot shift, anterior/posterior drawer, valgus/varus stress
    • Meniscal tests: Thessaly, McMurray
  • Interpret findings in the context of history, symptom behaviour, and other examination findings.

Functional assessment

  • Observe tasks relevant to the individual’s goals and context (e.g., squatting, stair negotiation, cutting or deceleration movements), where appropriate and safe.

Imaging considerations

  • Radiography is indicated when Ottawa Knee Rules criteria are met or when fracture is suspected.
  • Advanced imaging may be considered in complex, refractory, or surgically relevant cases following medical evaluation.

8. Clinical Presentation and Classification for Knee Ligament and Meniscal Injuries (Logerstedt 2017; Logerstedt 2018; Speziali 2016)

Clinical Presentation

No single history item or physical examination test is diagnostic. Clinical reasoning should be based on clusters of symptoms, signs, and impairments, interpreted in the context of the individual’s goals,  activity demands, and injury context.

Common features associated with knee ligament injury

  • Traumatic or non-contact mechanism involving twisting, cutting, or deceleration
  • Sensation of a “pop” at time of injury
  • Immediate or early joint swelling or hemarthrosis (within 0-12 hours following injury)
  • Sense of instability or giving way
  • Pain or symptom reproduction and excessive tibiofemoral laxity on cruciate/collateral ligament integrity testing
  • Strength, coordination, and proprioceptive deficits 
  • Abnormal compensatory strategies observed during deceleration or cutting movements

Common features associated with meniscal injury

  • Twisting or pivoting mechanism
  • Sensation of tearing or sharp pain at the time of injury
  • Joint-line pain or tenderness
  • Delayed effusion (6-24 hours post injury)
  • Mechanical symptoms (catching, locking, or giving way)
  • Pain with deep knee flexion or forced hyperextension
  • Pain or audible click during meniscal loading tests (McMurray’s maneuver)
  • Functional difficulty with squatting, pivoting, or stairs
  • Discomfort or locking/catching localized to the medial or lateral joint line during the Thessaly test at 20 degrees knee flexion

Movement and functional impairments (across injury types)

  • Reduced strength or coordination of the lower limb
  • Impaired single-leg balance or proprioception
  • Abnormal compensatory strategies during cutting, deceleration, or change-of-direction tasks
9. Conservative Treatment Considerations for Knee Ligament and Meniscal Injuries (Logerstedt 2017, 2018; Culvenor 2022)

Approach to Treatment

The treatments outlined in this section reflect core domains of care consistently identified across high-quality clinical practice guidelines and established clinical practices. These include interventions shown to improve patient-important outcomes such as pain, function, and quality of life. Management plans should be tailored to the individual’s needs, goals, and preferences, taking into account clinical presentation, response to care, and contextual factors.

Not all domains need to be included in every care plan or at every stage of recovery. Clinicians are expected to apply professional judgment in selecting the most relevant components based on the clinical context.

This pathway is not prescriptive, nor does it list every possible intervention. Readers are encouraged to consult individual guidelines for specific treatment protocols, dosage, and condition-specific considerations.

While a range of other interventions may be in use, such as passive physical modalities, these have mixed or limited evidence of clinical benefit and are therefore not recommended for routine use. If applied, such therapies should be used as adjuncts to the core, evidence-based components of care, and not as standalone treatment.

General principles

  • Treatment should target modifiable impairments (e.g., strength, neuromuscular control, proprioception, movement coordination).
  • Progression should be guided by tolerance, function, and response to load, rather than fixed timelines.
  • Care should support participation in daily activities, work, and sport, as appropriate to the individual.

Knee ligament injury (nonoperative or post-surgical)

Early-phase considerations

  • Early mobilization within tolerance and surgical or medical guidance
  • Progressive weight-bearing as appropriate
  • Cryotherapy for short-term symptom management, where indicated
  • Neuromuscular electrical stimulation as an adjunct to address quadriceps inhibition, when present

Ongoing rehabilitation considerations

  • Therapeutic exercise targeting lower-limb strength, coordination, and endurance
  • Neuromuscular re-education to address movement quality, dynamic stability, and proprioception
  • Task-specific and functional training relevant to individual goals
  • Supervised rehabilitation where complexity, risk, or performance demands warrant closer monitoring
  • Education and counselling to support adherence, confidence with movement, and return to activity

Meniscal injury (nonoperative or post-surgical)

Early-phase considerations

  • Progressive restoration of knee motion within tolerance
  • Symptom-guided loading and activity modification

Ongoing rehabilitation considerations

  • Progressive weight-bearing and return to functional activities
  • Therapeutic exercise focusing on strength, coordination, and joint control
  • Neuromuscular training and movement retraining
  • Supervised rehabilitation when mechanical symptoms, functional demands, or recovery complexity are present
  • Adjunctive use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation or biofeedback where indicated

Care delivery considerations

  • Treatment plans should be adapted for athletic and non-athletic populations.
  • Psychological responses to injury (e.g., fear of reinjury, low confidence) should be monitored and addressed or co-managed when indicated.
  • Ongoing reassessment of outcomes and goals should guide progression or referral decisions.
10. Risk and Prognostic Factors for Knee Ligament and Meniscal Injuries (Logerstedt 2017, 2018; Culvenor 2022)

Ligament injury

When considering noncontact ACL injury, clinicians should be aware of population-level risk factors described in the literature, including shoe–surface interaction, elevated body mass index, increased joint laxity, neuromuscular loading patterns involving strong quadriceps activation during eccentric contraction, and combined loading mechanisms. Certain anatomical and biological factors (e.g., femoral notch width, menstrual cycle phase) have been described at the population level but have limited applicability to individual risk stratification in clinical care.

In contrast, PCL, collateral ligament, and multi-ligament knee injuries most commonly occur due to contact mechanisms, and there is limited evidence to support meaningful risk factor stratification for these injuries beyond injury mechanism and severity.

Meniscal injury

Clinicians should recognize older age and longer duration since injury as factors associated with an increased likelihood of meniscal pathology. Individuals who engage in high-level or pivoting sports, or who demonstrate greater knee laxity following ACL injury, are at increased risk of persistent symptoms and a higher likelihood of requiring delayed meniscal surgery.

Meniscal injuries frequently coexist with ligamentous or chondral pathology, which may influence recovery trajectories and longer-term outcomes.

11. Ongoing Follow-up

Ongoing follow-up is a shared review of whether the plan remains safe, useful, acceptable and aligned with the patient’s goals. The timing of review should reflect symptoms, risk, the care being tried, goals and access rather than a fixed visit schedule.

  • Review symptoms and safety: ask what has changed in symptoms, functioning and daily activities; review adverse effects; and check for new or worsening Red Flags and relevant Orange or Yellow Flag concerns. Arrange earlier or urgent assessment when the findings require it.
  • Review outcomes: repeat the small set chosen at baseline and use the same measures when possible. These may include the Patient-Specific Functional Scale, WHODAS 2.0, quality of life using the patient’s own rating or a measure such as WHOQOL-BREF, symptom impact, participation and the patient’s own assessment of change. Interpret measures with the patient and alongside what has changed in daily life rather than relying on a score alone.
  • Review goals, preferences and consent: ask whether care remains acceptable, feasible and worthwhile; revisit goals and priorities; and confirm consent when the plan or circumstances change.
  • Adapt care: continue what is useful and acceptable, and change, pause or stop what is not. If progress is not sufficient from the patient’s perspective, review the clinical impression, the fit and amount of care, barriers to participation, other health or social factors and whether other expertise is needed.
  • Support self-management and participation: review the strategies the patient is using, including physical activity or exercise, symptom management, pacing and participation in work, school, caregiving, recreation or community life. Ask what is helping and which barriers can be addressed.
  • Referral and co-management: arrange emergency assessment for Red Flags requiring urgent care. Consider referral or co-management when findings or needs are beyond the clinician’s role, the patient’s condition is worsening, progress remains insufficient after the plan has been reviewed, or the patient requests another opinion.
  • Plan the next step: agree whether to continue, change the interval between visits, move toward more self-directed care, or apply the Criteria for Discharge section.
12. Criteria for Discharge

Discharge is a shared decision about ending or transferring a course of care. It does not require complete symptom resolution, a normal outcome score or a fixed number of visits.

  • When discharge may be appropriate: consider discharge when the patient’s goals have been met to a degree they consider satisfactory; the patient feels able to manage with less or no clinician involvement; the patient chooses to end care; continued care is not providing enough benefit to justify its burden, cost or time; or care is being transferred to another provider.
  • Reassess before discharge: review symptoms, functioning, participation, selected outcomes, goals, adverse effects, confidence and preferences. Check for new or worsening Red Flags and any Orange or Yellow Flag concerns that still require action. If the condition is worsening or a safety concern remains, arrange the required assessment or referral rather than routine discharge.
  • When progress has slowed: review the clinical impression, response to care, goals, barriers and access, other health or social factors, and other reasonable options before deciding with the patient whether to continue, change or end care.
  • Plan after discharge: agree on self-management, physical activity or exercise, symptom management, pacing and participation in work, school, caregiving, recreation or community life. Explain which changes should prompt earlier or urgent assessment and when and where to seek care.
  • Future access to care: explain how the patient can return if symptoms recur, functioning declines, or goals or demands change. Any planned future review or supportive care should have an agreed purpose, expected benefit and review point.
  • Referral or transfer: explain the reason, share a relevant summary with the patient’s consent, and clarify who will address outstanding concerns when possible. Avoid an unintended gap in care when safety or ongoing needs remain.
  • If the patient ends care or does not return: respect the patient’s right to stop. Record what is known and unknown about the outcome, advice or referral offered, attempts to communicate when clinically warranted, and any unresolved safety concern. Follow applicable record keeping and communication requirements.
  • Documentation: record the reason care ended, the patient’s status and selected outcomes, goals and preferences, unresolved concerns, advice and self-management plan, referral or transfer details, and how to seek care again if needed.

References