About Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain
Nonarthritic hip joint pain refers to pain originating from intra-articular structures of the hip in the absence of established osteoarthritis or serious underlying pathology. These conditions commonly affect adolescents and adults, particularly those who are physically active, and are frequently encountered in primary care and rehabilitation settings.
Common sources of nonarthritic hip joint pain include femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)–related pain, labral pathology, and other intra-articular mechanical disorders. Symptoms often arise gradually, may fluctuate with activity, and can significantly impact function, participation, and quality of life.
Nonarthritic hip joint pain is typically mechanical and load-related, with symptoms provoked by activities involving hip flexion, rotation, prolonged sitting, squatting, or sport-specific movements. Importantly, imaging findings (e.g., labral tears or cam/pincer morphology) are common in asymptomatic individuals and should be interpreted cautiously within the clinical context.
In the absence of red flags or advanced joint disease, conservative management is recommended as first-line care. Many individuals experience meaningful improvement with education, activity modification, and structured rehabilitation. Surgical intervention is not first-line and should only be considered after appropriate conservative care and shared decision-making.
This care pathway focuses on the assessment and conservative management of nonarthritic hip joint pain, and does not address hip osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthropathies, fracture, infection, or neoplastic conditions.
About CCG Care Pathways
Purpose
CCG is a knowledge translation resource of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. Its care pathways help chiropractors and other clinicians organize conservative care for musculoskeletal conditions. Each pathway outlines the main steps of the clinical encounter and supports decisions about assessment, care, monitoring, referral, co-management, and discharge. The pathways provide a structured approach to care, not a fixed prescription.
Development
Pathways draw on relevant clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, peer-reviewed literature, and safety or professional sources. These sources inform, but do not determine, pathway content. Their findings reflect the questions, populations, outcomes, methods, and judgments used and may not apply to every person. Condition-specific sources are identified by author or organization and year, with full citations in one reference list at the end of the pathway.
Principles of Care
Musculoskeletal conditions are shaped by physical, psychological, social, cultural, and environmental factors, so no single approach fits everyone. Good care is ethical, evidence-informed, person-centred, culturally responsive, and tailored to the patient’s goals, preferences, circumstances, and response. Shared decision-making and informed consent guide care. Education, active rehabilitation, and self-management support recovery, functioning, participation, and long-term health. Regular reassessment shows whether the plan is helping and when to continue, adapt, stop, refer, co-manage, or discharge.populations.
Pathway Flow at a Glance
The pathway follows a recurring clinical cycle: understand the person and their goals; screen for safety and referral needs; develop a working clinical profile; agree on a plan and relevant outcomes; provide care; reassess response and safety; and continue, adapt, stop, refer, co-manage, or discharge as appropriate.
Disclaimer
CCG care pathways support professional clinical judgment; they do not replace it or the advice of a qualified provider. They are not prescriptive, authoritative, or regulatory and are not intended for diagnosis or billing. Clinicians remain responsible for practicing within their competence and scope, meeting applicable legal and regulatory requirements, obtaining informed consent, recognizing emergencies, and arranging referral or co-management when needed.
Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain Care Pathway
1. Record Keeping
Accurate, timely, and sufficiently detailed documentation supports safe, high-quality care. The record should reflect clinically relevant patient interactions, clinical reasoning, decisions, care provided, and progress over time. Documentation should meet the legal, regulatory, privacy, retention, and organizational requirements that apply where the clinician practices. A structured format, such as SOAP, may support consistency, clarity, and continuity and can be adapted to the encounter and practice setting.
Subjective: Record the patient’s concerns, symptoms, functioning and participation, goals, preferences, relevant history and context, and response or adverse effects from previous care.
Objective: Record relevant examination findings, outcome measures, diagnostic test results when available, and clinically important changes.
Assessment: Record the clinical interpretation of findings, working diagnosis or clinical profile, differential and safety considerations, relevant risk factors or modifiers, and the patient’s progress or response.
Plan: Record care provided or proposed, education and self-management, consent and patient decisions, changes to the plan, agreed outcomes and reassessment point, referrals or co-management, follow-up, and discharge planning.
Document at the time of the encounter or as soon as practicable. Corrections and additions should preserve the integrity of the record. Clear records support patient safety, shared decision-making, communication, continuity, and accountability.
2. Informed Consent
- Definition: A continuing process in which a capable patient, or an authorized substitute decision-maker when required, voluntarily agrees to a proposed examination or intervention after receiving and understanding the information needed to make an informed choice.
- Key Aspects:
- Prior to interaction: Obtain consent before beginning an examination, procedure, or treatment, except where applicable law permits otherwise. Explain what is proposed and why. Revisit consent when the plan or material information changes.
- Voluntarily and specific: must be voluntary and specific to the proposed care. Consider the patient’s capacity for the decision at the time it is required and follow applicable requirements for substitute decision-making when the patient lacks capacity. The patient may ask questions, refuse, place limits on, or withdraw consent.
- Transparent process: Use honest, plain, and accessible communication. Offer interpretation or other communication support when needed and consider language, culture, health literacy, disability, and prior trauma. Written or digital information may support but does not replace discussion.
- Patient understanding and agreement:
- Diagnosis/prognosis: Explain relevant findings, the clinical impression or working diagnosis, important uncertainty, and the expected course in understandable language.
- Treatment plan: Discuss the nature and purpose of proposed care, expected benefits, material risks and side effects, burdens, reasonable alternatives, the option of no intervention, and the likely consequences of accepting or declining.
- Questions: Invite questions, explore goals and preferences, allow appropriate time for a decision, and confirm understanding, for example using teach-back.
- Documentation: Record the consent discussion and decision, including material information provided, questions, capacity or substitute decision-maker where relevant, consent, refusal, limits or withdrawal, and any need to revisit consent. Follow documentation requirements applicable to the jurisdiction and practice setting.
3. Health History
- Apply cultural awareness and trauma-informed care principles.
- Sociodemographic information: Age, gender, sex, race/ethnicity.
- Main complaint:
- Location (anterior hip/groin most common; may include deep hip pain or lateral referral), onset (often gradual; may follow changes in sport, training, or occupational load), duration, radiation, frequency, intensity, and character.
- Aggravating/relieving factors (hip flexion or rotation, squatting, running, pivoting, prolonged sitting, getting in/out of a car).
- Associated symptoms (e.g., mechanical symptoms such as clicking, catching, or giving way; back pain; leg symptoms; perceived weakness).
- Body systems review: Neurologic, cardiovascular, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, bone density, eyes/ears/nose/throat, respiratory, skin, mental health, reproductive.
- Health, lifestyle, and history:
- Past medical conditions (e.g., prior hip pathology, osteoarthritis, low back pain, inflammatory disease), medications (including corticosteroids or anticoagulants where relevant), supplements, injuries, hospitalizations, or surgeries.
- Physical activity and sport participation (type, volume, recent changes in load, training errors).
- Sleep habits, smoking, alcohol or substance use, family support, caregiver responsibilities.
- Work or school environment (prolonged sitting, squatting, lifting, repetitive movements).
- Social determinants of health: Employment, childcare responsibilities, education, nutrition, housing, experiences of discrimination or social isolation, access to care, and ability to modify work, sport, or physical demands.
- Previous treatments and responses: Document prior treatments, effectiveness, and any adverse effects.
- Beliefs and expectations: Assess patient understanding of their condition, treatment goals, and outcome expectations.
- Flag considerations: Identify red, orange, and yellow flags for potential referrals.
Outcomes Assessments: Prioritize approaches that align with the patient’s specific goals and clinical presentation.
- Pain: Use pain scales (e.g., NRS) and diagrams.
- Function and Participation: Evaluate impact on daily activities (LEFS, PSFS, WHODAS).
- Recovery: Use Self-rated recovery scales.
- Quality of Life: Assess using tools such as SF-12.
- Work/school Status: Monitor participation and return to activities.
- Sleep quality: Assess using tools such as PSQI.
- Individual Goals: Set SMART goal setting (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timely).
- Patient Feedback: Gather and integrate patient experience and satisfaction.
4. Red Flags : Differential Diagnosis Requiring Medical Referral
ACTION: Refer immediately to emergency care:
- Fracture or stress fracture: History of significant trauma; minor trauma in individuals with osteoporosis; acute onset of severe hip pain with inability to bear weight.
- Infection (septic arthritis or osteomyelitis): Fever, chills, unexplained systemic illness, severe unrelenting hip pain, night pain, immunosuppression, recent infection, or recent joint procedure.
- Tumor or malignancy: History of cancer, unexplained weight loss, constant or progressive pain not related to activity, night pain unrelieved by rest.
- Avascular necrosis: History of prolonged corticosteroid use, excessive alcohol consumption, sickle cell disease, or sudden worsening of deep hip pain.
- Cauda equina or serious neurological compromise: New onset bowel or bladder dysfunction, saddle anesthesia, progressive neurological deficits.
ACTION: Refer to appropriate medical provider:
- Inflammatory arthropathy: Morning stiffness lasting >60 minutes, multiple joint involvement, systemic features, or known inflammatory disease.
- Progressive or unexplained loss of hip motion or function: Particularly if disproportionate to examination findings.
- Persistent mechanical symptoms with significant functional limitation: Locking or true giving way that does not improve with conservative care.
- Failure to improve or progressive worsening despite appropriate conservative management: Consider need for further investigation or specialist referral.
5. Orange Flags: Symptoms of Psychiatric Disorders Requiring Referral
Orange Flags are signs that a mental health or substance use concern may require emergency or timely assessment or shared care, and may change whether and how MSK care proceeds. They are not diagnoses. Ask directly and respectfully when concern arises, considering immediate safety, severity, change from usual, daily functioning and context. Psychosocial factors that may affect recovery but do not require separate mental health or medical assessment are addressed under Yellow Flags.
ACTION: Arrange emergency assessment now when there is immediate danger or an urgent medical need:
- Suicide, self-harm or harm to others: current intent or plan, a recent attempt, inability to stay safe, or behaviour suggesting an immediate risk of serious harm.
- Severe change in mental state: extreme agitation, confusion, disorganization, possible psychosis or mania with impaired judgment or unsafe behaviour, or inability to meet basic needs when this creates immediate danger.
- Substance-related or medical emergency: suspected overdose, severe intoxication, dangerous withdrawal, delirium or another sudden change requiring urgent medical care.
When immediate safety is uncertain, do not leave the person alone while help is arranged. Follow local emergency procedures and call 9-1-1 for immediate danger or urgent medical need. If the person is thinking about suicide, call or text 9-8-8: Suicide Crisis Helpline with them or support them to do so.
If violence, abuse or exploitation is disclosed or suspected, support immediate safety and follow applicable safety and reporting requirements.
ACTION: Arrange prompt medical or mental health assessment when there is:
- Suicide or self-harm thoughts: thoughts without immediate danger.
- Substantial symptoms or effects: severe, persistent or worsening symptoms of depression, anxiety, trauma, possible psychosis or mania, eating problems or substance use that substantially affect daily life, decision-making or safe participation in care.
- Other reasons for assessment: a marked change from usual behaviour or functioning; concern about medication or substance effects; a presentation outside the clinician’s competence; or a request for help.
Agree with the patient on who will be contacted, how soon and what to do if the situation worsens. Confirm that the person has connected with the service when clinically important.
ACTION: Adapt and coordinate MSK care:
- Safe care: care may continue when it is safe and acceptable and does not delay needed assessment. Adapt communication, examination and care; obtain ongoing consent; and coordinate with other providers with the patient’s permission.
- Continue the MSK assessment: do not assume that a mental health or substance use concern explains the MSK presentation. Continue to consider physical causes and the patient’s account.
- Questionnaires: they may support conversation and monitoring, but do not establish a diagnosis or replace direct questions, clinical judgment or action.
- Acceptable support: ask what type of help is acceptable and whether language, cultural, family, community or other supports are important to the patient.
ACTION: Document and follow up:
Record the concern; relevant questions and the patient’s responses; the safety decision and reasons; actions, advice and referrals; communication and consent; follow-up; and any unresolved concern. Follow applicable privacy, safety and reporting requirements.
For provincial, territorial and national services, see Mental health support: Get help (Public Health Agency of Canada 2026).
6. Yellow Flags: Factors that May Affect Recovery or Participation
Yellow Flags are personal, social, work, school, healthcare, environmental or structural factors that may influence symptoms, functioning, participation or response to care. They are contextual, not diagnoses or certain predictions, and do not mean that symptoms are psychological. They guide how care is tailored and do not by themselves require urgent referral. Explore them through conversation and ongoing outcome review, with attention to the patient’s priorities, strengths and circumstances. A separate Yellow Flag score is not required. New or worsening signs of serious physical illness follow the Red Flag process. Mental health or substance use concerns that need separate assessment, or any immediate safety concern, follow the Orange Flag process and applicable emergency or safeguarding procedures.
Explore relevant factors:
- Understanding, expectations and healthcare experiences: concerns about injury or damage, uncertainty, recovery expectations, confidence, conflicting advice, previous dismissal or harm, and trust in care.
- Responses to symptoms and activity: worry, fear, avoidance, cycles of doing too much and then needing prolonged rest, difficulty pacing, coping, sleep, confidence in self-management, and return to meaningful activities.
- Emotional and life context: distress, low mood, anxiety, grief, trauma, caregiving, relationship change, job loss or other major events. Ask permission before sensitive questions and limit discussion to what is relevant and acceptable to the patient.
- Relationships, culture and strengths: supportive relationships, isolation, family and community roles, cultural or spiritual practices, identity, preferences, language and other sources of resilience.
- Work, school and administrative context: physical and psychosocial demands, control, satisfaction, job security, accommodations, return concerns, and compensation, insurance or legal processes. Explore these neutrally and in context.
- Social and structural conditions: consider social and structural determinants of health (Public Health Agency of Canada 2026), including income, housing, food security, transportation, childcare, access and cost of care, discrimination, racism, colonialism, neighbourhood and workplace conditions, and physical or digital accessibility.
ACTION: Respond with the patient:
- Ask, do not assume: use open questions to understand what helps, what gets in the way, what matters and what feels feasible. Ask about strengths and protective factors, not only difficulties. Do not treat a person’s circumstances, culture or choices as a deficit.
- Plan together: integrate relevant findings into shared goals, education, self-management, physical activity or exercise, and participation in meaningful activities. Adapt communication, setting, pace, cost and access where possible.
- Connect and coordinate: with the patient’s consent, consider appropriate clinical, social, workplace, school, community, Indigenous or culturally specific supports. Clarify who will do what and follow up when the connection is important to the plan.
- Review response to care: reassess the patient’s account and the pathway’s selected outcomes at clinically relevant points. If progress differs from expected, review the clinical impression, care plan, access and other barriers; do not automatically attribute the outcome to Yellow Flags.
- Document: record relevant factors and strengths, the patient’s priorities and preferences, agreed actions, consent, referrals or coordination, follow-up, and any change requiring the Orange Flag process.
7. Physical Examination for Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain
The physical examination should be used to confirm consistency with nonarthritic hip joint pain, exclude serious pathology, and guide conservative management. Findings should be interpreted in combination with the health history and symptom behaviour.
- Observation and posture:
Standing and sitting posture, pelvic alignment, lower-limb alignment, and movement patterns. Observe for antalgic gait, reduced stride length, or altered weight-bearing. - Gait assessment:
Walking, stairs, and task-specific movements relevant to the individual’s activities (e.g., running, squatting). Note pain provocation, asymmetry, or compensatory strategies. - Range of motion (ROM):
Active and passive hip ROM, with particular attention to flexion, internal rotation, and combined flexion-adduction-internal rotation positions. Assess symptom reproduction and end-range behaviour. - Resisted range of motion / strength testing:
Assess hip flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, and rotation. Note pain reproduction, strength deficits, and tolerance to load rather than isolated strength grading alone. - Functional loading tests:
Tasks such as squatting, step-downs, lunges, single-leg stance, or sport-specific movements to assess symptom response under load. - Special tests:
Provocative tests (e.g., FADIR, FABER) may reproduce symptoms. Results should be interpreted in context and not used in isolation to determine pathology. - Lumbar spine and pelvic screening:
Assess lumbar ROM and symptom reproduction to evaluate potential referral or co-existing contributors. - Neurological screening:
Brief screening of lower-limb strength, sensation, and reflexes to exclude neurological involvement.
Clinical Interpretation
- No single physical examination test is diagnostic for nonarthritic hip joint pain.
- Symptom reproduction with combined movements and functional loading, rather than isolated findings, is most informative.
- Examination findings should inform management planning.
8. Clinical Presentations for Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain
Nonarthritic hip joint pain typically presents with mechanical, activity-related symptoms originating from the hip joint, in the absence of advanced osteoarthritis or serious underlying pathology. Presentations are common in adolescents and adults, particularly those who are physically active.
General Presentation
- Pain location: Most commonly anterior hip or groin pain; may also be described as deep hip pain or pain radiating to the thigh.
- Symptom behaviour: Symptoms are typically load- and position-dependent, aggravated by hip flexion, rotation, squatting, running, pivoting, prolonged sitting, or getting in and out of a car.
- Onset and course: Often gradual and insidious; may follow changes in training volume, sport participation, or occupational demands.
- Associated features: Mechanical symptoms such as clicking, catching, or sensations of instability may be reported but are not diagnostic in isolation.
Common Nonarthritic Hip Joint Presentations
Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI)–related Pain
- Activity-related anterior hip or groin pain.
- Symptoms provoked by combined hip flexion, adduction, and internal rotation positions.
- Functional limitations with squatting, sitting, running, and sport-specific tasks.
Labral-Related Hip Pain
- Deep hip or groin pain, sometimes accompanied by clicking or catching sensations.
- Symptoms may worsen with prolonged sitting, pivoting, or directional changes.
- Labral findings on imaging are common in asymptomatic individuals and should be interpreted cautiously.
Other Intra-Articular Mechanical Hip Pain
- Pain reproduced with hip joint loading and end-range movements.
- Overlap with lumbar spine or pelvic contributions is common.
Clinical Interpretation
- Most individuals with nonarthritic hip joint pain can be managed initially with conservative care, regardless of imaging findings.
- Clinical presentations are often overlapping and non-specific, and pain location or mechanical symptoms alone do not identify a single pain generator.
- Imaging findings (e.g., cam/pincer morphology, labral tears) are not synonymous with symptoms and should not be used in isolation to guide management decisions.
9. Conservative Treatment Considerations for Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain
Approach to Treatment
Conservative management is recommended as first-line care for nonarthritic hip joint pain. Management should be individualized, function-focused, and informed by symptom behaviour, activity demands, and patient goals, rather than imaging findings alone.
The treatments outlined below reflect core domains of care identified in clinical practice guidelines. Not all components are required for every individual or at every stage of recovery. Clinicians are expected to apply professional judgment when selecting and sequencing interventions.
This pathway is not prescriptive and does not list all possible interventions. Where additional treatments are used, they should be applied as adjuncts to core conservative care, not as stand-alone treatments.
Education and Self-Management
Education is a foundational component of care and should emphasize the mechanical, load- and position-related nature of nonarthritic hip joint pain, the common discordance between imaging findings and symptoms, and the generally favourable prognosis with appropriate management.
Key elements include:
- Reassurance and explanation of the condition and recovery expectations
- Guidance on activity modification and load management, including temporary avoidance of provocative positions (e.g., deep hip flexion, sustained rotation, prolonged sitting)
- Promotion of continued movement and participation using pacing and graded exposure strategies
- Support for self-management behaviours (physical activity, sleep, nutrition, stress management)
Exercise Therapy
Exercise therapy is recommended as first-line treatment.
Programs should be:
- Individualized and progressive
- Focused on improving hip and pelvic strength, endurance, movement control, and functional capacity
- Integrated with functional retraining relevant to work, sport, and daily activities
- Progressed based on symptom response and functional tolerance, rather than time alone
No single exercise approach has been shown to be superior. Programs should align with patient goals and participation demands.
Manual Therapy
Manual therapy may be used as an adjunct to support pain modulation, movement confidence, and engagement in active rehabilitation.
Manual therapy should:
- Be integrated with exercise and education
- Not be used as a stand-alone intervention
Activity and Return-to-Participation Planning
- Use criteria-based progression for return to work, sport, and other activities
- Prioritize symptom behaviour, strength, movement control, and confidence
- Address barriers to participation, including fear of movement, access to care, and competing life demands
Medications and Injections (Medical Provider; Selected Cases)
- Short-term use of analgesics or NSAIDs may be considered by a medical provider when pain significantly limits participation in rehabilitation.
- Intra-articular injections may be considered selectively for short-term symptom relief or diagnostic clarification, to support engagement in conservative care, but are not recommended as first-line or definitive treatment.
Escalation and Referral
Consider referral for further assessment when there is:
- Persistent, function-limiting symptoms despite an adequate trial of conservative care
- Progressive functional decline or inability to progress rehabilitation
- Diagnostic uncertainty or concern for alternative pathology
(APTA Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy 2023)
10. Risk and Prognostic Factors and Prognosis
Risk Factors
Nonarthritic hip joint pain is multifactorial. Common risk factors include:
- Activity exposure: High-volume or high-intensity sport participation; repetitive pivoting, cutting, sprinting, deep squatting, or rapid increases in training load.
- Movement and loading factors: Repeated end-range hip flexion or rotation loading and reduced movement control under load.
- Structural features: Cam or pincer morphology and labral pathology, which are common in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals and should be interpreted in context.
- Previous hip symptoms or injury: Prior episodes of hip pain or periods of deconditioning followed by rapid re-loading.
- Co-existing conditions: Low back or pelvic pain that may alter movement patterns and load distribution.
Prognostic Factors
Factors associated with slower recovery or persistent symptoms include:
- Longer symptom duration before initiating appropriate conservative care
- Higher baseline pain and functional limitation
- Limited ability to modify provocative activities (e.g., sport or work demands)
- Psychosocial factors that reduce engagement with active rehabilitation (e.g., fear of movement, low recovery expectations)
- Poor adherence to exercise-based care or limited access to rehabilitation services
- Co-existing low back or pelvic pain
Imaging findings alone (e.g., cam/pincer morphology, labral tears) are not reliable predictors of outcome.
Prognosis
The prognosis for nonarthritic hip joint pain is generally favourable with appropriate conservative management.
- Many individuals experience meaningful improvements with education, load management, and structured exercise-based rehabilitation.
- Recovery is often gradual, particularly in those with persistent symptoms or high functional demands.
- Failure to improve after an adequate trial of conservative care should prompt re-evaluation and shared decision-making, rather than escalation based on imaging findings alone.
11. Ongoing Follow-up
Ongoing follow-up is a shared review of whether the plan remains safe, useful, acceptable and aligned with the patient’s goals. The timing of review should reflect symptoms, risk, the care being tried, goals and access rather than a fixed visit schedule.
- Review symptoms and safety: ask what has changed in symptoms, functioning and daily activities; review adverse effects; and check for new or worsening Red Flags and relevant Orange or Yellow Flag concerns. Arrange earlier or urgent assessment when the findings require it.
- Review outcomes: repeat the small set chosen at baseline and use the same measures when possible. These may include the Patient-Specific Functional Scale, WHODAS 2.0, quality of life using the patient’s own rating or a measure such as WHOQOL-BREF, symptom impact, participation and the patient’s own assessment of change. Interpret measures with the patient and alongside what has changed in daily life rather than relying on a score alone.
- Review goals, preferences and consent: ask whether care remains acceptable, feasible and worthwhile; revisit goals and priorities; and confirm consent when the plan or circumstances change.
- Adapt care: continue what is useful and acceptable, and change, pause or stop what is not. If progress is not sufficient from the patient’s perspective, review the clinical impression, the fit and amount of care, barriers to participation, other health or social factors and whether other expertise is needed.
- Support self-management and participation: review the strategies the patient is using, including physical activity or exercise, symptom management, pacing and participation in work, school, caregiving, recreation or community life. Ask what is helping and which barriers can be addressed.
- Referral and co-management: arrange emergency assessment for Red Flags requiring urgent care. Consider referral or co-management when findings or needs are beyond the clinician’s role, the patient’s condition is worsening, progress remains insufficient after the plan has been reviewed, or the patient requests another opinion.
- Plan the next step: agree whether to continue, change the interval between visits, move toward more self-directed care, or apply the Criteria for Discharge section.
12. Criteria for Discharge
Discharge is a shared decision about ending or transferring a course of care. It does not require complete symptom resolution, a normal outcome score or a fixed number of visits.
- When discharge may be appropriate: consider discharge when the patient’s goals have been met to a degree they consider satisfactory; the patient feels able to manage with less or no clinician involvement; the patient chooses to end care; continued care is not providing enough benefit to justify its burden, cost or time; or care is being transferred to another provider.
- Reassess before discharge: review symptoms, functioning, participation, selected outcomes, goals, adverse effects, confidence and preferences. Check for new or worsening Red Flags and any Orange or Yellow Flag concerns that still require action. If the condition is worsening or a safety concern remains, arrange the required assessment or referral rather than routine discharge.
- When progress has slowed: review the clinical impression, response to care, goals, barriers and access, other health or social factors, and other reasonable options before deciding with the patient whether to continue, change or end care.
- Plan after discharge: agree on self-management, physical activity or exercise, symptom management, pacing and participation in work, school, caregiving, recreation or community life. Explain which changes should prompt earlier or urgent assessment and when and where to seek care.
- Future access to care: explain how the patient can return if symptoms recur, functioning declines, or goals or demands change. Any planned future review or supportive care should have an agreed purpose, expected benefit and review point.
- Referral or transfer: explain the reason, share a relevant summary with the patient’s consent, and clarify who will address outstanding concerns when possible. Avoid an unintended gap in care when safety or ongoing needs remain.
- If the patient ends care or does not return: respect the patient’s right to stop. Record what is known and unknown about the outcome, advice or referral offered, attempts to communicate when clinically warranted, and any unresolved safety concern. Follow applicable record keeping and communication requirements.
- Documentation: record the reason care ended, the patient’s status and selected outcomes, goals and preferences, unresolved concerns, advice and self-management plan, referral or transfer details, and how to seek care again if needed.
References
- APTA Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy 2023. Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated With Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain: A Revision (CPG+)
